Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (160) (remove)
Language
- German (105)
- English (54)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (160)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (160)
Keywords
- - (58)
- Freiburg <Breisgau> / Pädagogische Hochschule (27)
- Eugen (Philosoph) (12)
- Fink (12)
- Pädagogik (9)
- Lehrerbildung (7)
- Philosophie (7)
- Religionspädagogik (7)
- Gustav (5)
- Siewerth (5)
Institute
- Rektorat (47)
- Institut für Evangelische und Katholische Theologie / Religionspädagogik (26)
- Institut für Anglistik (10)
- Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft (8)
- Fakultät für Bildungswissenschaften (2)
- Institut für Biologie und ihre Didaktik (2)
- Institut für deutsche Sprache und Literatur (2)
- Fakultät für Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften (1)
- Fakultät für Mathematik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik (1)
- Institut für Alltagskultur, Bewegung und Gesundheit (1)
Maturity models are increasingly used to advance the processes of organizations, including Higher Education Institutions. In this paper, we review existing maturity models to analyze and optimize the accessibility of organizations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature research in the databases Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, BASE, ACM, and Google Scholar, resulting in 13 different maturity models. An additional web search on maturity models for accessibility found another 12 maturity models that we added to the results. Finally, we analyzed the 25 maturity models in more detail, specifically the indicators that each maturity model uses to measure accessibility. The most frequent indicators were “responsibility”, “competences & training”, and “monitoring”, with differences in the frequencies when separated by target group. Out of the 25 maturity models found, only 6 focused on Higher Education Institutions. None of the existing maturity models focuses on teaching and learning of accessibility explicitly.