TY - JOUR U1 - Wissenschaftlicher Artikel A1 - Saboga-Nunes, Luis A1 - Bittlingmayer, Uwe H. A1 - Harsch, Stefanie A1 - Vincenzi, Silvana Ligia A1 - da Silva, Silvio Aparecido A1 - Konrath, Andréa Cristina A1 - Estabel, Lizandra Brasil A1 - da Silva Moro, Eliane Lourdes A1 - Santini, Luciane Alves A1 - da Silveira, Filipe Xerxeneski A1 - Cardoso, Darclé A1 - Sebold, Roselita A1 - Pereira Barbosa, Celeste Aparecida A1 - Farinelli, Marta Regina A1 - de Andrade, Dalton Francisco T1 - Psychometric properties of the health literacy instrument in Brazil (HLS-EU-BR47) JF - BMC Public Health N2 - Abstract Background Health literacy (HL) is a key component of health promotion and sustainability and contributes to well-being. Despite its global relevance, HL is an under-researched topic in South America but is now debuting its exploration in Brazil. To leverage its benefits for South America, the mere translation of validated tools into Portuguese is insufficient. Rather, it is necessary to examine their validity. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-BR47) using the Item Response Theory (IRT) in a population-based sample of adults in Brazil. Methods A cross-sectional online study was conducted across Brazil and included 1028 participants aged 18 years and above (80% women). Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, factor analysis, graded responses model, Item Characteristic Curve, HL levels based on this, HL standard calculation, IRT, and regular score correlation were computed. Results The instrument exhibit high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.95). Factor analysis yielded one factor. IRT was appropriate for data analysis because it allowed quality evaluation of items and constructed a scale to quantify HL. The 47 items and latent features of respondents in the same unit of measurement are positioned in the construction of the HLS-EU-BR47 instrument. The percentages of individuals at each HL level, calculated using IRT, were found to be comparable to those obtained through the standard computation, e.g., 3.2% of people reported very low HL versus 10.8% inadequate HL, 56.2% reported low HL versus 39.5% problematic HL, 31.1% had moderate HL versus 30.1% sufficient HL, and 9.5% had high HL versus 19.7% with excellent HL. The mean HL scores were comparable between women and men (33.9 vs. 33.7, P  = 0.36). Conclusion This study provides new evidence of the validity of a widely used HL instrument for the population of South America (in this case, Brazil). This tool can be utilized by citizens, health professionals, and regional/national policymakers to inform the development of initiatives to assess and improve the HL of individuals, groups, and communities. Further studies are needed to confirm and extend the findings and to explore the influence of local cultures and practices in the vast Brazilian territory on HL. KW - - KW - Health literacy KW - Item response theory KW - Gradual response model KW - Validity of the instrument, measurement scale of health literacy, Brazil Y1 - 2024 UN - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:frei129-opus4-34293 SN - 1471-2458 SS - 1471-2458 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19108-2 DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19108-2 VL - 24 IS - 1 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER -